Showing posts with label team. Show all posts
Showing posts with label team. Show all posts

Sunday, May 16, 2010

LEADERSHIP - A Key Fundamental Business Tenant



Situation: You have been working 14+ hour days on a very important request for proposal (RFP) for the mid-sized company for which you work. You haven’t seen much of your family, and your spouse is starting to get pretty agitated with you. While you explain to her how the extra time you put into this proposal will really benefit the company and its ability to land some key new accounts, it is increasingly falling on deaf ears. You and your team are among the highest performers in the company and have been motivated in large part because you know your efforts really make a difference. Recently, you have been wondering if being the “A-team” is really worth it.

One afternoon as you are contemplating whether or not to work late to tighten up the RFP and potentially insert additional client studies that would make the RFP stand out, you look out at the golf course view you have from your office. There is a foursome playing the hole near your building and you notice it is your boss, the CEO and two of the sales guys on the account for whom the RFP is being prepared. “Damn it!” you mumble. “Here I am killing myself and pulling in chits from my wife to stay late to make this RFP sing and those guys are out there playing golf. I know when the RFP gets submitted, the CEO and the sales guys are going to expect me to present the details that they should be explaining to the client. On top of that, the sales guys get the commission and the CEO is going to get a big pat on the back (and a bunch of stock) when we land these next accounts. You know what, the RFP is good enough – I’m going home.”

How does a leader get the best out of his/her people? Or conversely, how does a leader prevent his/her “A” players from working like “B” players?

Build a Team, Choose a Path and Motivate

While there have been countless books written on how to best lead, I believe all of it boils down to those three concepts. Trust, communication, setting an example, being decisive, taking responsibility, etc., are all critical to being a strong leader, but those characteristics have to drive (1) Building a Team, (2) Choosing a Path, and (3) Motivating people.

It is unfortunately unusual to find a leader that is truly effective and understands the importance of these three points. Often times whether due to poor mentoring, personal insecurities, fear, ego, rigid views around hierarchy, poor listening skills, or a host of other issues, many “leaders” fail to do one or all three effectively. Getting people to do what you want because they fear you (a la Kim Jong Il) is not leading. Leading is creating an environment where people come together naturally in the pursuit of a common goal and motivating them to perform at high levels of productivity.

Building a team:  One builds a maximally effective team by creating an environment where all members of a group feel their participation and perspective is valued, their input is considered and free communication fosters unfettered debate. I touched on this in the very first post – the foundation of building a team is trust. An effective team has Respect for each other, engages in open Debate, focuses on Logic not emotion, it is Business not personal, has a Clear Action Plan, and holds others in the team Accountable.

Choosing a Path:  Ultimately it is the leader who is accountable for the direction of the organization. Before choosing a path though, the effective leader should have an intimate grasp of the complexities of the organization, business, and the problem through diligence with members of the organization and its stake holders. This requires listening and thinking. The leader takes this mindful diligence and open team debate and arrives at his/her view of the right goal for the organization and the best path to take to achieve that goal. If there has been sufficient diligence and debate, whatever direction the leader arrives at (note the direction is not determined by group vote, but by the leader assessing all input), then there will be group buy-in and ownership of the goal.

Motivating People:  Motivating people is a complex endeavor. I believe the best motivators are actually those that don’t appear to be doing it. It is like the old Zen concept of mastering something without focusing on it. While there are many examples in sports of coaches motivating players before a big game to out-perform their expectations ...and then the Americans beat the Soviets... in the business world motivational pep-talks are valuable but don’t generally drive long term consistent motivation. As important as they are, corporate goals rarely generate the same kind of white-hot passion as winning Olympic gold. To motivate effectively over the long term, the business leader must build the right team, chose the right path, then by lead by example (inspire through actions). Leading by example could be as obvious as the leader going out and meeting with all the customers or staying late with the team that is cranking on the new customer RFP, or it could be something small like helping set up at a trade show or vacuuming the storage room. If the rest of the team knows that you are willing to do what it takes to reach the goal and you are not asking them to do something you wouldn’t do, then they will be right by your side, in many cases way ahead of you. Conversely, regardless of Knute Rockne-esque words, if the leader is not giving 100%, the team will lose its passion.

Obviously, a leader can also motivate using money, recognition, or other “compensation”. While compensation is certainly an important component of corporate motivation (as we all want to get paid for what we do), without the motivation resultant from building a team, choosing a path, and leading by example, the motivation will be fleeting. More often than not, companies use compensation to make up for lack of true leadership in their staff and then wonder why the improved performance didn’t last after the bonus check was cut.

So, if you want your staff to go the extra mile, add the extra zip to the customer presentation, or burn the midnight oil because “it will really make a difference”, then they need to know they are part of a team that they trust, are working for a common agreed upon goal, and see you right there with them. The great leader creates that kind of environment and in doing so turns the vast majority of the group into high performance A players that put in 14 hour days with a smile rather than 8 hour days with a frown and monster.com on speed dial.

-Bob




Tuesday, April 13, 2010

TRUST - A Key Fundamental Business Tenant



Situation: Sitting with a group of people (a meeting, a cocktail party, a casual conversation, whatever) and one of the people in the group feels really strongly about the topic, seems to know more than the others, or has significant power over the fortunes of the others. You have something important to contribute that might contradict the prevailing wind of discussion, might add a relevant overlooked fact, or might just force the group to consider the merits of an alternative course of action. What determines whether or not you speak your mind?

TRUST

In all organizations, young / old, small / large, public / private, interpersonal dynamics determine whether a group maximizes the knowledge and skill of its members. If each team member trusts that his/her opinion will be respected and honestly considered and that everyone will be held accountable to “do what they say they will do”, then the group will benefit from open dialogue and will likely arrive at the best course of action. Without that trust, team members will play politics and only reinforce the view point of the strongest willed member or will only shallowly bring up opinions counter to the conversational trend.

You say, "Yea, I know this – it is pretty basic Group Think stuff…" Might be basic, but it is everywhere and personal insecurities make sure it is unfortunately the norm.

Trust in the Team: The foundation of a healthy and successful organization is building and maintaining a cohesive leadership team whose interaction is based on trust. It is the goal of the effective leader to snuff out the tendency of any group to orbit dominant personalities – particularly that of the leader. Trust is not created by saying “I will not fire you if you disagree with me”, or “my door is always open”, true trust is built over time through many interactions reinforcing the following:

- Respect: Team members know they won’t get their head "bitten off" if they speak their mind.  (See the picture above.)
- Debate: The team engages in energetic unfiltered debate around important topics (and doesn’t waste energy on trivial issues.)
- Logic: Debate centers around logic and fact, not emotion and personalities.
- Business, not personal: Each team member knows that everyone has the best interests of the team / organization at heart - all discussion is about the business, it is not personal.
- Clear action plan: The team and individuals commit to specific plans of action.
- Accountability: The team follows up on progress and holds one another accountable.

While seemingly obvious, in practice most organizations / teams fail in at least one of the above areas. The last two (Clear action plan and Accountability) are often surprisingly difficult. You can have unfettered debate, respect for your team members and focus on logic not emotion, but if you do not set clear action plans and hold the team members accountable daily and weekly, politics will prevail. People will realize that success is not necessarily based upon performance and will focus on the fact that some people are not equally pulling their oars. All members of the team must feel comfortable calling out missed deadlines - not meeting action plans impacts the success of entire team, not just the individual.

Diagnosing Trust in an Organization: How do you know if you have a “Trusting Team”? (Excerpted from Patrick Lencioni’s The Five Dysfunctions of a Team – Jossey-Bass 2002)

Members of a Trusting Team:
- Admit weaknesses and mistakes
- Ask for help and constructive feedback about their areas of responsibility
- Take risks in offering others feedback and assistance
- Appreciate and tap into one another’s skills and experiences
- Focus time and energy on important issues, not politics
- Openly address viewpoints of other’s performance in the group (no backstabbing)
- Have leaders that are good listeners and encourage a free flow of dialogue
- Look forward to meetings and other opportunities to work as a group


Members of a Team in the absence of Trust:
- Conceal their weaknesses and mistakes from one another
- Hesitate to ask for help or provide constructive feedback
- Say negative things about members of the team behind their backs & hold grudges
- Fail to recognize and tap into one another’s skills and experiences
- Are afraid to hold others accountable for lack of performance
- Have “table pounding” emotional or insecure leaders that dictate discussions
- Dread meetings and find reasons to avoid spending time as a group

The next time you are in a group setting, I encourage you to assess what type of group dynamics are going on. Does the conversation flow freely with people highly engaged, readily accepting constructive criticism and you don’t feel time passing? Or is the discussion dominated by one or two individuals with the others seeming like spectators until the topic gets to their area of expertise and you look at your watch every 10 minutes thinking you need another cup of coffee?

If you are in the latter group, there may be some very drastic things you will have to do to change the dynamics and culture of that organization. But that is for a future post…

-Bob